Welcome to Varied Expressions of Worship

Welcome to Varied Expressions of Worship

This blog will be written from an orthodox Christian point of view. There may be some topic that is out of bounds, but at present I don't know what it will be. Politics is a part of life. Theology and philosophy are disciplines that we all participate in even if we don't think so. The Bible has a lot to say about economics. How about self defense? Is war ethical? Think of all the things that someone tells you we should not touch and let's give it a try. Everything that is a part of life should be an expression of worship.

Keep it courteous and be kind to those less blessed than you, but by all means don't worry about agreeing. We learn more when we get backed into a corner.
Showing posts with label NT 21 I Peter 1. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NT 21 I Peter 1. Show all posts

Opus 2026-041: Monday Pulpit: Popular Misquotes

Sunday we were discussing what it meant to live a righteous life.  We had read several quotations in the book of Romans that use the word.  From there we started talking about holiness, and sanctification.  Eventually, we got to one of those great favorite misquotes of the Bible,
“Be ye holy as I am holy”

My guess is that you’ve heard it before.  It’s the way it’s usually expressed.  It is also totally wrong and misses the entire point.

After quoting it the next statement by someone in the group is, it’s impossible to be as holy as God.  Well, if the actual biblical statement was as given, then, no, it would not be impossible, because the Bible tells us to do it.  But the Bible doesn’t set that standard.

What does the Bible actually say?

1 Peter 1:16 (KJV) Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy.
The command was not to be as holy as God. The command was to be holy because of God.

From there you could get into a discussion of what it means to be holy.  You could point out that the idea of being holy means more separation than moral purity.  You could point out that we are called “saints” which means “holy ones”.  You’ll find that there’s an Old Testament equivalent, under the law.

So don’t waste your time trying to understand misquotes.  When you hear something that doesn’t quite seem right, go to the Source.  You would be amazed at how often the actual quotation is not what somebody thinks it is.

What they say is on them.  What you believe is on you.

homo unius libri

Opus 2023-328: Gestalt Theology

I believe in Gestalt interpretation of the Bible:  You must take it all into consideration.  What we disparagingly call proof-texts have a place but that place is fragile when the verse stands alone.  If it is supported by other verses, it has power.  If you have two ideas that seem to be at odds then it is important to dig deeper to find the common ground, Gestalt.

One contrast that has been on my mind a lot is the Biblical expectation that we live righteously.  At least I think it is a Biblical expectation.  Many would say that it is impossible to live an upright life.  They have a problem if they gestalt the whole Bible.  Consider,

(1Pe 1:13-16 NAS77) Therefore, gird your minds for action, keep sober in spirit, fix your hope completely on the grace to be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ.  As obedient children, do not be conformed to the former lusts which were yours in your ignorance, but like the Holy One who called you, be holy yourselves also in all your behavior; because it is written, "YOU SHALL BE HOLY, FOR I AM HOLY."
I keep coming across passages that fit in with this.  Psalm 18 specifically says that David kept the law and was righteous.  
(Psa 18:20 KJV)  The LORD rewarded me according to my righteousness; according to the cleanness of my hands hath he recompensed me.
Psalms and Proverbs are full of this kind of statement.  

James, although he declares that works are necessary, seems to imply that we cannot keep the law.
(Jas 2:10 KJV)  For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.
He does not come right out and say you can’t keep it, but the point is there.  On the other hand he does imply that you can keep most of the law.

Both must be combined for the final understanding.  

James is talking about original sin and being born in sin.  Paul would say, “For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God.”

David is pointing out that it is possible to live a righteous life.  This point is supported by Zachariah and Elizabeth and other examples.

Don’t confuse the two or ignore one point.  Walk straight.  Live upright.  God gives the power, you supply the will.

homo unius libri