You’ve all heard the question about which is stronger, the irresistible force or the immovable object. I continue to vote for the irresistible force simply because persistence wears down stubbornness.
We have been in Texas almost seven years. Almost the day we moved in my wife started talking about a riding mower. We are on roughly two acres and about half of it needs to be mowed. I kept saying a push mower would be fine. I needed the exercise and still had the strength to do it. Every time the grass got longer than she liked the subject came up again. A variation was hiring someone to do it. I never wavered but she never backed off.
Finally we came to the point where my mower blew up. Bidenomics have almost tripled the cost of a replacement. While I was trying to work up to the investment she planted two seeds. One was with my son in law about fixing up one he had in his yard. The other was with our neighbor who is mechanically inclined. The son in law decided the one he had could not be repaired. As far as I knew the neighbor was out of the competition. I went ahead and bought a new push mower. About two weeks later the neighbor came over riding a mower for us to look at.
I now have a riding mower.
The irresistible force keeps working even when the immovable object is not paying attention.
The element that is left out of the equation is time. If you’re just talking about now, then you are faced by a very philosophical problem. If you add the long, eternal progression of time, it changes the whole situation. Water will splash off a rock. It seem to have lost the battle. If you extend that contact over thousands of years than you began to see that the rock has been worn a bit. In time the rock will be split or done away with.
I don’t remember this truth being a part of our marriage counseling or vows.
homo unius libri
Pages
▼
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome. Feel free to agree or disagree but keep it clean, courteous and short. I heard some shorthand on a podcast: TLDR, Too long, didn't read.