I can’t remember which on-line newspaper I saw it on but it seems that someone shot George Zimmerman as he was driving down the street. The bullet went through the window. The article said he was not seriously injured.
The headline laid the blame on “road rage”. There was nothing in the article to give any substance to that headline. It seems more of an editorial comment than reporting. It would seem to me that this could have been one of the many vigilantes in the country who did not like the acquittal of Zimmerman and have committed themselves to shooting him on sight.
It is dangerous to be considered not-guilty by a jury of your peers when the thug media has already condemned you. We see this repeatedly. The media smells blood and ratings and begins to report only part of the news and even make things up to stir the mobs to action. As the truth begins to come out the thinking public reevaluates but the mob yells coverup. Remember the Duke lacrosse players being accused of rape? Probably. Do you remember that eventually the prosecutor was prosecuted for making much of it up? Probably not. Keep in mind that this could be any one of us. I don’t know George Zimmerman but I know he was pronounced “not-guilty” by people who heard all the evidence.
Read with discernment
homo unius libri
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are welcome. Feel free to agree or disagree but keep it clean, courteous and short. I heard some shorthand on a podcast: TLDR, Too long, didn't read.