Pages

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Opus 2013-84: New Terms: Bipartisanship

The Washington Times, National Weekly has a feature called “Inside the Ring” written by Bill Gertz.  In the February 11 edition, page 21 he is discussing the growing aggression of the Chinese navy and the challenge that presents. 

That is not what got my attention.

What stood out to me was a good definition of bipartisanship as defined by the current Democratic leadership.  He is quoting a Captain James Fanell
“China is challenging other nations’ rights...under the rubric of ‘what’s mine is mine, and we’ll negotiate what’s yours.’”
This is exactly the way the Progressives (Democrats, socialists, liberals, left, moderates) have been negotiating for years.  We keep moving toward the left and then they want to share what we have remaining.

You can find definitions in the most interesting places.  I wonder if it is any coincidence that the Communist Chinese and the current administration have the same philosophy of political compromise?

homo unius libri

2 comments:

Comments are welcome. Feel free to agree or disagree but keep it clean, courteous and short. I heard some shorthand on a podcast: TLDR, Too long, didn't read.