tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774578704070563428.post6454885128625500461..comments2024-03-17T06:57:38.349-07:00Comments on Medley of Worship: Opus 2013-207: Why So Many Bibles?, part 2 of 3, Best Original SourcesPumicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05226427953642942426noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774578704070563428.post-32043791170056318002013-07-02T05:11:24.582-07:002013-07-02T05:11:24.582-07:00I remember listening to a pod-cast that was dealin...I remember listening to a pod-cast that was dealing with that. They seemed to be saying that some "scholars" are saying that the crucifixion or resurrection needed to be moved in order to provide for the "three days." Since it is not an issue I didn't do any research on it. <br /><br />Taking a quick look, you are referring to Mark 16:9 which is in the questioned section but it is not the only place. Matthew 28:1, Mark 16:2 (not in the questioned section), Luke 24:1 and John 20:1 all refer to the first day. It is hard to believe that it was added "after the fact" in all four gospels.<br /><br /><br />Grace and peace.Pumicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05226427953642942426noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7774578704070563428.post-4278385791721326112013-07-01T18:14:08.820-07:002013-07-01T18:14:08.820-07:00I've often wondered, too, if the last "pa...I've often wondered, too, if the last "page" was lost. I DO think it's interesting, though, that the only place in the Bible that seems to actually say that Jesus arose on Sunday is in a scripture some say was added after the fact.Gorges Smythehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08777621500611603786noreply@blogger.com